You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retraction Note: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with selective transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-02167-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhangheng Huang, Yuexin Tong, Zhiyi Fan, Chuan Hu, Chengliang Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,579,458
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#259
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,665
of 503,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#34
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.