↓ Skip to main content

Non-Technical Skills Bingo—a game to facilitate the learning of complex concepts

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Simulation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-Technical Skills Bingo—a game to facilitate the learning of complex concepts
Published in
Advances in Simulation, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41077-016-0024-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Ronnie Glavin, Rikke Malene Hartvigsen Grønholm Jepsen, Ralf Krage

Abstract

Acquiring the concepts of non-technical skills (NTS) beyond a superficial level is a challenge for healthcare professionals and simulation faculty. Current simulation-based approaches to teach NTS are challenged when learners have to master NTS concepts, clinically challenging situations, and simulation as a complex technique. The combination of all three aspects might overwhelm learners. To facilitate the deeper comprehension of NTS concepts, we describe an innovative video-based game, the Non-Technical Skills (NTS) Bingo. Participants get NTS Bingo cards that show five NTS elements each. While observing (non-medical) video clips, they try to find examples for the elements on their cards, typically observable behaviours that match a given element. After the video, participants "defend" their solution in a discussion with the game leader and other players. This discussion and the reflection aim to deepen the processing of the NTS concepts. We provide practical guidance for the conduct of NTS Bingo, including a selection of usable video clips and tips for the facilitated discussion after a clip. We use NTS in anaesthesia as example and provide guidance on how to adapt NTS Bingo to other disciplines. NTS Bingo is based on theoretical considerations on concept learning, which we describe to support the rationale for its conduct.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 14 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,343,246
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#56
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,501
of 363,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.