You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do guidelines influence the implementation of health programs? — Uganda’s experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliet Nabyonga Orem, Juliet Bataringaya Wavamunno, Solome K Bakeera, Bart Criel |
Abstract |
A guideline contains processes and procedures intended to guide health service delivery. However, the presence of guidelines may not guarantee their implementation, which may be a result of weaknesses in the development process. This study was undertaken to describe the processes of developing health planning, services management, and clinical guidelines within the health sector in Uganda, with the goal of understanding how these processes facilitate or abate the utility of guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Mexico | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 24% |
Researcher | 33 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 18% |
Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 35 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,831,221
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#767
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,462
of 175,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.