↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis - biological plausibility from a critical care perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis - biological plausibility from a critical care perspective
Published in
Critical Care, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc10597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu Shankar-Hari, Jo Spencer, William A Sewell, Kathryn M Rowan, Mervyn Singer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 105 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Other 15 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Professor 10 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#911,792
of 8,078,414 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#917
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,333
of 257,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#85
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,078,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.