↓ Skip to main content

Making sense of DialysisConnect: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder viewpoints on a web-based information exchange platform to improve care transitions between dialysis clinics and hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making sense of DialysisConnect: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder viewpoints on a web-based information exchange platform to improve care transitions between dialysis clinics and hospitals
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12911-021-01415-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann E. Vandenberg, Bernard G. Jaar, Kyle P. James, Janice Lea, Christopher O’Donnell, Tahsin Masud, Rich Mutell, Laura C. Plantinga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 22%
Unspecified 7 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,668,551
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,336
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,440
of 512,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#37
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.