↓ Skip to main content

Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A Petersen, Tracy Urech, Kate Simpson, Kenneth Pietz, Sylvia J Hysong, Jochen Profit, Douglas Conrad, R Adams Dudley, Meghan Z Lutschg, Robert Petzel, LeChauncy D Woodard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,733,889
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,002
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,820
of 133,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.