↓ Skip to main content

Finding biomedical categories in Medline®

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Finding biomedical categories in Medline®
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/2041-1480-3-s3-s3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lana Yeganova, Won Kim, Donald C Comeau, W John Wilbur

Abstract

There are several humanly defined ontologies relevant to Medline. However, Medline is a fast growing collection of biomedical documents which creates difficulties in updating and expanding these humanly defined ontologies. Automatically identifying meaningful categories of entities in a large text corpus is useful for information extraction, construction of machine learning features, and development of semantic representations. In this paper we describe and compare two methods for automatically learning meaningful biomedical categories in Medline. The first approach is a simple statistical method that uses part-of-speech and frequency information to extract a list of frequent nouns from Medline. The second method implements an alignment-based technique to learn frequent generic patterns that indicate a hyponymy/hypernymy relationship between a pair of noun phrases. We then apply these patterns to Medline to collect frequent hypernyms as potential biomedical categories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Mexico 1 5%
French Polynesia 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Other 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Professor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Computer Science 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#299
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,916
of 172,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.