You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with pectus excavatum compared with normal controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-12-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roya S Saleh, J Paul Finn, Michael Fenchel, Abbas Nasirae Moghadam, Mayil Krishnam, Marlon Abrazado, Anthony Ton, Reza Habibi, Eric W Fonkalsrud, Christopher B Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 63% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,537,548
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,091
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,291
of 192,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.