↓ Skip to main content

Clinical tolerability of artesunate-amodiaquine versus comparator treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria: an individual-patient analysis of eight randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical tolerability of artesunate-amodiaquine versus comparator treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria: an individual-patient analysis of eight randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Zwang, Grant Dorsey, Abdoulaye Djimdé, Corine Karema, Andreas Mårtensson, Jean-Louis Ndiaye, Sodiomon B Sirima, Piero Olliaro

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Rwanda 1 1%
Unknown 59 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 20 30%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Psychology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,469,464
of 14,579,200 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,724
of 4,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,779
of 262,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,579,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them