You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative Automated Microscopy (QuAM) Elucidates Growth Factor Specific Signalling in Pain Sensitization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Pain, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8069-6-98 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Andres, Sonja Meyer, Olayinka A Dina, Jon D Levine, Tim Hucho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#205
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,654
of 177,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.