↓ Skip to main content

Where did they not go? Considerations for generating pseudo-absences for telemetry-based habitat models

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Ecology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where did they not go? Considerations for generating pseudo-absences for telemetry-based habitat models
Published in
Movement Ecology, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40462-021-00240-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliott L. Hazen, Briana Abrahms, Stephanie Brodie, Gemma Carroll, Heather Welch, Steven J. Bograd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 31%
Environmental Science 32 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,851,531
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#215
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,526
of 423,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.