↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiological implications of hypoxia in human diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiological implications of hypoxia in human diseases
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12929-020-00658-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pai-Sheng Chen, Wen-Tai Chiu, Pei-Ling Hsu, Shih-Chieh Lin, I-Chen Peng, Chia-Yih Wang, Shaw-Jenq Tsai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 130 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Chemistry 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 136 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,611,205
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#618
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,960
of 418,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.