↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiological implications of hypoxia in human diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiological implications of hypoxia in human diseases
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12929-020-00658-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pai-Sheng Chen, Wen-Tai Chiu, Pei-Ling Hsu, Shih-Chieh Lin, I-Chen Peng, Chia-Yih Wang, Shaw-Jenq Tsai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 60 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 63 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#12,606,051
of 21,346,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#537
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,951
of 313,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them