You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Representing and querying disease networks using graph databases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioData Mining, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13040-016-0102-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Artem Lysenko, Irina A. Roznovăţ, Mansoor Saqi, Alexander Mazein, Christopher J Rawlings, Charles Auffray |
| Abstract |
Systems biology experiments generate large volumes of data of multiple modalities and this information presents a challenge for integration due to a mix of complexity together with rich semantics. Here, we describe how graph databases provide a powerful framework for storage, querying and envisioning of biological data. We show how graph databases are well suited for the representation of biological information, which is typically highly connected, semi-structured and unpredictable. We outline an application case that uses the Neo4j graph database for building and querying a prototype network to provide biological context to asthma related genes. Our study suggests that graph databases provide a flexible solution for the integration of multiple types of biological data and facilitate exploratory data mining to support hypothesis generation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| France | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 54% |
| Scientists | 18 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 56 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,337,606
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#15
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,155
of 380,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.