↓ Skip to main content

Mechanistic strategies of microbial communities regulating lignocellulose deconstruction in a UK salt marsh

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanistic strategies of microbial communities regulating lignocellulose deconstruction in a UK salt marsh
Published in
Microbiome, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00964-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R. Leadbeater, Nicola C. Oates, Joseph P. Bennett, Yi Li, Adam A. Dowle, Joe D. Taylor, Juliana Sanchez Alponti, Alexander T. Setchfield, Anna M. Alessi, Thorunn Helgason, Simon J. McQueen-Mason, Neil C. Bruce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Environmental Science 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,596,086
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,140
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,900
of 419,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#69
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.