You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of time to relapse in amphetamine-type substance users in the matrix treatment program in Iran: a Cox proportional hazard model application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-016-0973-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Moeeni, Emran M. Razaghi, Koen Ponnet, Fatemeh Torabi, Seyed Ali Shafiee, Tahereh Pashaei |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine which predictors influence the risk of relapse among a cohort of amphetamine-type substance (ATS) users in Iran. A Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to determine factors associated with the relapse time in the Matrix treatment program provided by the Iranian National Center of Addiction Studies (INCAS) between March 2010 and October 2011. Participating in more treatment sessions was associated with a lower probability of relapse. On the other hand, patients with less family support, longer dependence on ATS, and those with an experience of casual sex and a history of criminal offenses were more likely to relapse. This study broadens our understanding of factors influencing the risk of relapse in ATS use among an Iranian sample. The findings can guide practitioners during the treatment program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,767,869
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,608
of 4,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,153
of 365,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#54
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.