↓ Skip to main content

Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement
Published in
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12987-020-00195-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Brastad Evensen, Per Kristian Eide

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Master 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 71 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Engineering 23 12%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 80 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,471,523
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#92
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,989
of 381,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.