↓ Skip to main content

Development of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for lipid traits and clinical applications for dyslipidemia, subclinical atherosclerosis, and diabetes cardiovascular complications among East Asians

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for lipid traits and clinical applications for dyslipidemia, subclinical atherosclerosis, and diabetes cardiovascular complications among East Asians
Published in
Genome Medicine, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13073-021-00831-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia H. T. Tam, Cadmon K. P. Lim, Andrea O. Y. Luk, Alex C. W. Ng, Heung-man Lee, Guozhi Jiang, Eric S. H. Lau, Baoqi Fan, Raymond Wan, Alice P. S. Kong, Wing-hung Tam, Risa Ozaki, Elaine Y. K. Chow, Ka-fai Lee, Shing-chung Siu, Grace Hui, Chiu-chi Tsang, Kam-piu Lau, Jenny Y. Y. Leung, Man-wo Tsang, Grace Kam, Ip-tim Lau, June K. Y. Li, Vincent T. F. Yeung, Emmy Lau, Stanley Lo, Samuel Fung, Yuk-lun Cheng, Chun-chung Chow, Miao Hu, Weichuan Yu, Stephen K. W. Tsui, Yu Huang, Huiyao Lan, Cheuk-chun Szeto, Nelson L. S. Tang, Maggie C. Y. Ng, Wing-yee So, Brian Tomlinson, Juliana C. N. Chan, Ronald C. W. Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Unspecified 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 31 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,594,524
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#777
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,849
of 425,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#22
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.