↓ Skip to main content

Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00581-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mervyn Conroy, Aisha Y. Malik, Catherine Hale, Catherine Weir, Alan Brockie, Chris Turner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 40 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Philosophy 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 42 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,475,276
of 23,493,900 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#621
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,109
of 421,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,493,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.