You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computed tomography assessment of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03477-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Ball, Chiara Robba, Lorenzo Maiello, Jacob Herrmann, Sarah E. Gerard, Yi Xin, Denise Battaglini, Iole Brunetti, Giuseppe Minetti, Sara Seitun, Antonio Vena, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Matteo Bassetti, Patricia R. M. Rocco, Maurizio Cereda, Lucio Castellan, Nicolò Patroniti, Paolo Pelosi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 13 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#920,788
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#700
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,333
of 450,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.