↓ Skip to main content

Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Horning, Charles B. Delahunt, Christine M. Bachman, Jennifer Luchavez, Christian Luna, Liming Hu, Mayoore S. Jaiswal, Clay M. Thompson, Sourabh Kulhare, Samantha Janko, Benjamin K. Wilson, Travis Ostbye, Martha Mehanian, Roman Gebrehiwot, Grace Yun, David Bell, Stephane Proux, Jane Y. Carter, Wellington Oyibo, Dionicia Gamboa, Mehul Dhorda, Ranitha Vongpromek, Peter L. Chiodini, Bernhards Ogutu, Earl G. Long, Kyaw Tun, Thomas R. Burkot, Ken Lilley, Courosh Mehanian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Engineering 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 27 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,048,680
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,763
of 5,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,397
of 418,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#101
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.