You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dicer-like proteins influence Arabidopsis root microbiota independent of RNA-directed DNA methylation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40168-020-00966-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richa Kaushal, Li Peng, Sunil K. Singh, Mengrui Zhang, Xinlian Zhang, Juan I. Vílchez, Zhen Wang, Danxia He, Yu Yang, Suhui Lv, Zhongtian Xu, Rafael J. L. Morcillo, Wei Wang, Weichang Huang, Paul W. Paré, Chun-Peng Song, Jian-Kang Zhu, Renyi Liu, Wenxuan Zhong, Ping Ma, Huiming Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 3 | 27% |
China | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,843,785
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,106
of 1,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,861
of 450,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#59
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.