↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients: mid-term follow up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients: mid-term follow up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12968-021-00710-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Wang, Ruili Li, Zhen Zhou, Hong Jiang, Zixu Yan, Xinyan Tao, Hongjun Li, Lei Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 47 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 54 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,952,734
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#623
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,731
of 451,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.