You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The catatonic dilemma expanded
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of General Psychiatry, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-859x-5-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heath R Penland, Natalie Weder, Rajesh R Tampi |
| Abstract |
Catatonia is a common syndrome that was first described in the literature by Karl Kahlbaum in 1874. The literature is still developing and remains unclear on many issues, especially classification, diagnosis, and pathophysiology. Clinicians caring for psychiatric patients with catatonic syndromes continue to face many dilemmas in diagnosis and treatment. We discuss many of the common problems encountered in the care of a catatonic patient, and discuss each problem with a review of the literature. Focus is on practical aspects of classification, epidemiology, differential diagnosis, treatment, medical comorbidity, cognition, emotion, prognosis, and areas for future research in catatonic syndromes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 19% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 29% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 57% |
| Psychology | 12 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#284
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,485
of 67,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.