You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducibility and relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for the Chinese lactating mothers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00678-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye Ding, Fang Li, Ping Hu, Mei Ye, Fangping Xu, Wei Jiang, Yue Yang, Youjuan Fu, Yunhua Zhu, Xiaolong Lu, Ying Liu, Zhencheng Xie, Zhixu Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,790,452
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,286
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,022
of 420,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.