You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Multiple aplasia cutis congenita type V and fetus papyraceous: a case report and review of the literature
Journal of Medical Case Reports, March 2021
V. Thadchanamoorthy, Kavinda Dayasiri, M. Thirukumar, N. Thamilvannan, S. H. Chandraratne
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||4||17%|
|Student > Master||3||13%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||26%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||9%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||4%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
of 4,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 420,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.