↓ Skip to main content

Bathing and toileting difficulties of older adults in rural China: the role of environment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bathing and toileting difficulties of older adults in rural China: the role of environment
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12877-020-01919-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changxi Liu, Joelle H. Fong, Jasmon W. T. Hoh, Hailin Wu, Yunsheng Dong, Danan Gu, Qiushi Feng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,671,957
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,409
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,555
of 508,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#130
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.