↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic performance of the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogens panel to detect rotavirus in Ghanaian children with and without diarrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic performance of the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogens panel to detect rotavirus in Ghanaian children with and without diarrhoea
Published in
Virology Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0588-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelie Leva, Daniel Eibach, Ralf Krumkamp, Julia Käsmaier, Dennis Rubbenstroth, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie, Jürgen May, Egbert Tannich, Marcus Panning

Abstract

Rotavirus is one of the leading causes of childhood diarrhoea worldwide. The highest disease burden is seen in resource-constrained settings of sub-Saharan Africa. Recently, commercial multiplex PCR panels proved their accuracy to diagnose infectious gastroenteritis in Europe and the USA. However, data on their performance using samples from tropical regions in general and to detect rotavirus in particular remains scant. We aimed to analyse the diagnostic performance of the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogens panel, a multiplex PCR, to detect rotavirus in stool samples from Ghanaian children. A total of 682 stool samples were collected in the Ashanti region of Ghana between 2007 and 2008. Of these, 341 were from cases (children with diarrhoea), and another 341 from controls (children without diarrhoea). All samples were analysed using the Luminex xTAG assay and compared to a rotavirus quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (reference assay). Rotavirus reference assay positive samples were P and G genotyped by sequencing the rotavirus VP4 and VP7 genes. Overall agreement between the Luminex xTAG and the reference assay was excellent (kappa 0.93). The sensitivity and specificity was 88.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 78.2-94.1) and 100 % (95 % CI 99.2-100), respectively. Of 76 rotavirus reference assay positive samples, 64 were successfully genotyped and the Luminex xTAG assay was able to detect all rotavirus genotypes present in the study. The Luminex xTAG assay proved a sensitive and highly specific tool to detect rotavirus and may aid clinicians and public health authorities in the diagnosis and surveillance of rotavirus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,816
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,248
of 3,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,535
of 365,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#36
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.