You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistency and applicability of different brief screen instrument of cognitive function in elderly population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12883-021-02048-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lixia Lu, Lin Chen, Weiwen Wu, Yang Wang, Zhenbao Liu, Jun Xu, Qianhong Yang, Jun Zhao, Liangxian Liu, Hui Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,286,138
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#511
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,667
of 419,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#16
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.