You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of failure with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-021-00538-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricard Mellado-Artigas, Luis Eduardo Mujica, Magda Liliana Ruiz, Bruno Leonel Ferreyro, Federico Angriman, Egoitz Arruti, Antoni Torres, Enric Barbeta, Jesús Villar, Carlos Ferrando |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Cuba | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,302,970
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#108
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,248
of 429,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.