↓ Skip to main content

Single leg mini squat: an inter-tester reproducibility study of children in the age of 9–10 and 12–14 years presented by various methods of kappa calculation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single leg mini squat: an inter-tester reproducibility study of children in the age of 9–10 and 12–14 years presented by various methods of kappa calculation
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Junge, Sølvi Balsnes, Lisbeth Runge, Birgit Juul-Kristensen, Niels Wedderkopp

Abstract

Multiple studies suggest that reduced postural orientation is a possible risk factor for both patello-femoral joint pain (PFP) and rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). In order to prevent PFP and ACL injuries in adolescent athletes, it is necessary to develop simple and predictive screening tests to identify those at high risk. Single Leg Mini Squat (SLMS) is a functional and dynamic real-time screening test, which has shown good validity and reproducibility in evaluation of postural orientation of the knee in an adult population. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-tester reproducibility of SLMS in the age group of 9-10 and 12-14 years by evaluating postural orientation of the ankle, knee, hip and trunk. Further on, this study exemplify the divergence of kappa values when using different methods of calculating kappa for the same dataset.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Sports and Recreations 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 33 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,328,209
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#953
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,816
of 138,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#81
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.