↓ Skip to main content

A random-sampling approach to track cell divisions in time-lapse fluorescence microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A random-sampling approach to track cell divisions in time-lapse fluorescence microscopy
Published in
Plant Methods, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13007-021-00723-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saoirse Amarteifio, Todd Fallesen, Gunnar Pruessner, Giovanni Sena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,661,574
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#631
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,430
of 422,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.