↓ Skip to main content

Determination of wheat spike and spikelet architecture and grain traits using X-ray Computed Tomography imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of wheat spike and spikelet architecture and grain traits using X-ray Computed Tomography imaging
Published in
Plant Methods, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13007-021-00726-5
Authors

Hu Zhou, Andrew B. Riche, Malcolm J. Hawkesford, William R. Whalley, Brian S. Atkinson, Craig J. Sturrock, Sacha J. Mooney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 59%
Unknown 7 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,876,829
of 20,501,648 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#543
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,038
of 316,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,501,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them