↓ Skip to main content

A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Gatehouse, Marijn P Rolf, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Martin J Graves, Philip J Kilner, David N Firmin, Mark BM Hofman

Abstract

Phase-contrast velocity images often contain a background or baseline offset error, which adds an unknown offset to the measured velocities. For accurate flow measurements, this offset must be shown negligible or corrected. Some correction techniques depend on replicating the clinical flow acquisition using a uniform stationary phantom, in order to measure the baseline offset at the region of interest and subtract it from the clinical study. Such techniques assume that the background offset is stable over the time of a patient scan, or even longer if the phantom scans are acquired later, or derived from pre-stored background correction images. There is no published evidence regarding temporal stability of the background offset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Other 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Engineering 15 28%
Physics and Astronomy 6 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,889,200
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,287
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,068
of 194,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.