↓ Skip to main content

Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor score

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor score
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jolien Aalbers, Kirsty K O'Brien, Wai-Sun Chan, Gavin A Falk, Conor Teljeur, Borislav D Dimitrov, Tom Fahey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 30 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 20 11%
Other 47 25%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 27 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#870,441
of 18,279,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#672
of 2,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,687
of 368,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,279,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them