You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of additional protein on lean body mass preservation in post-bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00688-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marleen M. Romeijn, Daniëlle D. B. Holthuijsen, Aniek M. Kolen, Loes Janssen, Goof Schep, François M. H. van Dielen, Wouter K. G. Leclercq |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,673,476
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,175
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,267
of 424,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.