↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Poor sensitivity of "AccuPower SARS‑CoV‑2 real time RT‑PCR kit (Bioneer, South Korea)"

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Poor sensitivity of "AccuPower SARS‑CoV‑2 real time RT‑PCR kit (Bioneer, South Korea)"
Published in
Virology Journal, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12985-021-01506-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Byron Freire‑Paspuel, Miguel Angel Garcia‑Bereguiain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#12,242,137
of 20,509,700 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,291
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,846
of 371,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,509,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them