You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Test performance of faecal occult blood testing for the detection of bowel cancer in people with chronic kidney disease (DETECT) protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-516 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Germaine Wong, Kirsten Howard, Jeremy R Chapman, Allison Tong, Michael J Bourke, Andrew Hayen, Petra Macaskill, Richard L Hope, Narelle Williams, Anh Kieu, Richard Allen, Steven Chadban, Carol Pollock, Angela Webster, Simon D Roger, Jonathan C Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2011.
All research outputs
#20,692,340
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,189
of 15,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,240
of 116,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#216
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.