You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic examination of the use of Online social networking sites for sexual health promotion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judy Gold, Alisa E Pedrana, Rachel Sacks-Davis, Margaret E Hellard, Shanton Chang, Steve Howard, Louise Keogh, Jane S Hocking, Mark A Stoove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 20% |
| Spain | 6 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 18% |
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 23% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 8% |
| Psychology | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,109,178
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,202
of 16,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,337
of 123,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.