You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An exploration of the missing data mechanism in an Internet based smoking cessation trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-157 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dan Jackson, Dan Mason, Ian R White, Stephen Sutton |
Abstract |
Missing outcome data are very common in smoking cessation trials. It is often assumed that all such missing data are from participants who have been unsuccessful in giving up smoking ("missing=smoking"). Here we use data from a recent Internet based smoking cessation trial in order to investigate which of a set of a priori chosen baseline variables are predictive of missingness, and the evidence for and against the "missing=smoking" assumption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 7 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 24% |
Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,726
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,769
of 174,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.