↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of low-dose theophylline for the management of biomass-associated COPD (LODOT-BCOPD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of low-dose theophylline for the management of biomass-associated COPD (LODOT-BCOPD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05163-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trishul Siddharthan, Suzanne L. Pollard, Peter Jackson, Nicole M. Robertson, Adaeze C. Wosu, Nihaal Rahman, Roma Padalkar, Isaac Sekitoleko, Esther Namazzi, Patricia Alupo, John R. Hurst, Robert Kalyesubula, David Dowdy, Robert Wise, Peter J. Barnes, William Checkley, Bruce Kirenga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 42 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 41 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,795,788
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#657
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,916
of 458,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.