↓ Skip to main content

Mistaken Identifiers: Gene name errors can be introduced inadvertently when using Excel in bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 7,742)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
citeulike
28 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mistaken Identifiers: Gene name errors can be introduced inadvertently when using Excel in bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-5-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry R Zeeberg, Joseph Riss, David W Kane, Kimberly J Bussey, Edward Uchio, W Marston Linehan, J Carl Barrett, John N Weinstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 418 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 6%
United Kingdom 10 3%
Canada 7 2%
Germany 6 2%
France 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 265 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 114 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 21%
Student > Master 25 7%
Other 22 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 7%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 19 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 13%
Computer Science 30 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 30 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 604. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#38,351
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 7,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 59,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.