You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major prospects for exploring canine vector borne diseases and novel intervention methods using 'omic technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-4-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin B Gasser, Cinzia Cantacessi, Bronwyn E Campbell, Andreas Hofmann, Domenico Otranto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2011.
All research outputs
#4,806,113
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,074
of 5,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,804
of 110,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.