You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
INC-Seq: accurate single molecule reads using nanopore sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-016-0140-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenhao Li, Kern Rei Chng, Esther Jia Hui Boey, Amanda Hui Qi Ng, Andreas Wilm, Niranjan Nagarajan |
| Abstract |
Nanopore sequencing provides a rapid, cheap and portable real-time sequencing platform with the potential to revolutionize genomics. However, several applications are limited by relatively high single-read error rates (>10 %), including RNA-seq, haplotype sequencing and 16S sequencing. We developed the Intramolecular-ligated Nanopore Consensus Sequencing (INC-Seq) as a strategy for obtaining long and accurate nanopore reads, starting with low input DNA. Applying INC-Seq for 16S rRNA-based bacterial profiling generated full-length amplicon sequences with a median accuracy >97 %. INC-Seq reads enabled accurate species-level classification, identification of species at 0.1 % abundance and robust quantification of relative abundances, providing a cheap and effective approach for pathogen detection and microbiome profiling on the MinION system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| Japan | 4 | 7% |
| Singapore | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 46% |
| Scientists | 27 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 345 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 95 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 5% |
| Engineering | 16 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#768,729
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#86
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,169
of 383,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.