You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic value of X-chromosome inactivation in symptomatic female carriers of dystrophinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonàs Juan-Mateu, Maria José Rodríguez, Andrés Nascimento, Cecilia Jiménez-Mallebrera, Lidia González-Quereda, Eloy Rivas, Carmen Paradas, Marcos Madruga, Pedro Sánchez-Ayaso, Cristina Jou, Laura González-Mera, Francina Munell, Manuel Roig-Quilis, Maria Rabasa, Aurelio Hernández-Lain, Jorge Díaz-Manera, Eduard Gallardo, Jordi Pascual, Edgard Verdura, Jaume Colomer, Montserrat Baiget, Montse Olivé, Pia Gallano |
| Abstract |
Between 8% and 22% of female carriers of DMD mutations exhibit clinical symptoms of variable severity. Development of symptoms in DMD mutation carriers without chromosomal rearrangements has been attributed to skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) favouring predominant expression of the DMD mutant allele. However the prognostic use of XCI analysis is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between X-chromosome inactivation and development of clinical symptoms in a series of symptomatic female carriers of dystrophinopathy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 30% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,670,096
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,994
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,603
of 183,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.