You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility investigation of allogeneic endometrial regenerative cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-7-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhaohui Zhong, Amit N Patel, Thomas E Ichim, Neil H Riordan, Hao Wang, Wei-Ping Min, Erik J Woods, Michael Reid, Eduardo Mansilla, Gustavo H Marin, Hugo Drago, Michael P Murphy, Boris Minev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 150% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,194,464
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#348
of 4,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,903
of 95,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them