↓ Skip to main content

Resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in solid tumors: can we improve the cancer fighting strategy by blocking autophagy?

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in solid tumors: can we improve the cancer fighting strategy by blocking autophagy?
Published in
Cancer Cell International, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12935-016-0341-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanja Aveic, Gian Paolo Tonini

Abstract

A growing field of evidence suggests the involvement of oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in the transformation of malignant cells. Constitutive and abnormal activation of RTKs may occur in tumors either through hyperactivation of mutated RTKs or via functional upregulation by RTK-coding gene amplification. In several types of cancer prognosis and therapeutic responses were found to be associated with deregulated activation of one or more RTKs. Therefore, targeting various RTKs remains a significant challenge in the treatment of patients with diverse malignancies. However, a frequent issue with the use of RTK inhibitors is drug resistance. Autophagy activation during treatment with RTK inhibitors has been commonly observed as an obstacle to more efficacious therapy and has been associated with the limited efficacy of RTK inhibitors. In the present review, we discuss autophagy activation after the administration of RTK inhibitors and summarize the achievements of combination RTK/autophagy inhibitor therapy in overcoming the reported resistance to RTK inhibitors in a growing number of cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,419,855
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#963
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,697
of 377,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.