You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-211 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca J Guy, Hammad Ali, Bette Liu, Simone Poznanski, James Ward, Basil Donovan, John Kaldor, Jane Hocking |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,399,617
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,461
of 7,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,307
of 121,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.