You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The harvest plot: A method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Ogilvie, Debra Fayter, Mark Petticrew, Amanda Sowden, Sian Thomas, Margaret Whitehead, Gill Worthy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 14% |
| Psychology | 36 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,766,681
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#241
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,445
of 80,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.