↓ Skip to main content

Effect of acupuncture depth on muscle pain

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of acupuncture depth on muscle pain
Published in
Chinese Medicine, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1749-8546-6-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunori Itoh, Yoichi Minakawa, Hiroshi Kitakoji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#150
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,960
of 126,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.