↓ Skip to main content

Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem van Schaik, Janetta Top, David R Riley, Jos Boekhorst, Joyce EP Vrijenhoek, Claudia ME Schapendonk, Antoni PA Hendrickx, Isaäc J Nijman, Marc JM Bonten, Hervé Tettelin, Rob JL Willems

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 223 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 20%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 42 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,948
of 11,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,319
of 103,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#30
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.